孟子 7B.1
Because the benevolent take the real concern already present in intimate life and extend it outward. The non-benevolent do the reverse: the hardness with which they treat others comes back upon the very people they claim to love, until even the loved are ruined by it.
This passage serves searches around extending care, King Hui, and Mencius on how partial love must become wider humane order rather than remain a private contradiction.
孟子 7B.2
Because within the competitive structure of rival states, each side is still seeking power, and the claim of righteousness easily becomes self-packaging. Mencius allows relative superiority, but refuses to elevate that too quickly into full justice.
This passage serves searches around just war, Mencius, and the difference between relatively better and truly right. It is a foundational restraint on war rhetoric.
孟子 7B.3
Because once all interpretive judgment is surrendered, a text meant to illuminate reason becomes an authority that blocks reason. Mencius wants reverence for the classic without cancelling the responsibility to discriminate.
This passage serves searches around reading classics, textual authority, and Mencius on interpretation. It is a crucial anchor for the site's method, citation discipline, and AI-facing clarity.
孟子 7B.4
Because it shows that a person has made the capacity to seize and subdue into a central object of admiration. Mencius is correcting the hierarchy: when a ruler truly loves benevolence, the key to allegiance is not superior killing power but superior self-rectification and care for the people.
This passage serves searches around militarism, Mencius, and violence as admired skill. It is central to the intersection of war ethics and humane government.
孟子 7B.5
Because standards, methods, and tools are teachable, but genuine skill and judgment must be formed by the learner's own repeated practice.
This passage serves searches around learning, standards, skill, and the difference between teaching and mastery.
孟子 7B.6
Because Shun was not defined by outward condition. Poverty did not embitter him, and kingship did not intoxicate him. His inner order stayed settled through change.
This passage serves searches around Shun, poverty, kingship, steadiness, and how Mencius understands inner stability.