Jin Xin II · Passage 24 / 38 · 孟子 7B.24

Mencius 7B.24: distinction between nature and appointment

Mencius is not playing abstract metaphysics. He is drawing a practical line: natural desire should not be lazily justified as nature.

孟子曰:「口之於味也,目之於色也,耳之於聲也,鼻之於臭也,四肢之於安佚也;性也,有命焉,君子不謂性也。仁之於父子也,義之於君臣也,禮之於賓主也,知之於賢者也,聖人之於天道也;命也,有性焉,君子不謂命也。」

mèng zǐ yuē:「kǒu zhī wū wèi yě, mù zhī wū sè yě, ěr zhī wū shēng yě, bí zhī wū chòu yě, sì zhī zhī wū ān yì yě; xìng yě, yǒu mìng yān, jūn zǐ bú wèi xìng yě。 rén zhī wū fù zǐ yě, yì zhī wū jūn chén yě, lǐ zhī wū bīn zhǔ yě, zhī zhī wū xián zhě yě, shèng rén zhī wū tiān dào yě; mìng yě, yǒu xìng yān, jūn zǐ bú wèi mìng yě。」

Mencius said, 'For the mouth to desire sweet tastes, the eye to desire beautiful colours, the ear to desire pleasant sounds, the nose to desire fragrant odours, and the four limbs to desire ease and rest - these things are natural. But there is the appointment of Heaven in connexion with them, and the superior man does not say of his pursuit of them, "It is my nature." The exercise of love between father and son, the observance of righteousness between sovereign and minister, the rules of ceremony between guest and host, the display of knowledge in recognising the talented, and the fulfilling the heavenly course by the sage - these are the appointment of Heaven. But there is an adaptation of our nature for them. The superior man does not say, in reference to them, "It is the appointment of Heaven."'

Priority note

A human-edited reading layer

Central question

Why does Mencius say that some things involve appointment but the superior person does not call them nature, while other things involve nature but he does not call them appointment?

Direct answer

Because he wants to block two evasions: one that absolves desire by calling it nature, and one that absolves responsibility by calling it fate. The superior person must judge both correctly.

First principle

Part of mature judgment is refusing easy excuses: neither 'this is just my nature' nor 'this is just fate' may be used to flee responsibility.

Why it matters

This passage is excellent for searches around nature, fate, responsibility, and Mencius's conceptual precision.

What this passage is doing

This is passage 24 of 38 in Jin Xin II. The cleanest entry point is "For the mouth to desire sweet tastes, the…". In context, it works as part of Mencius's argument about knowing words, knowing destiny, and the completion of cultivation and can be read alongside Human nature, Flood-like qi.

Broader search routes

If you came here with a wider question, start from the right hub page

Human nature is good: the starting point of moral growth

If your real query is broader than one citation, start from the theme page and use this passage as proof text.

Open human nature

Who is Mencius?

If you first need the person, the aliases, and why he matters, start from the about page.

Open About Mencius

Mencius quotes and sayings

If you arrived through a famous line, start from the quotes hub and then return to the exact passage.

Open Mencius quotes

Mencius full text and works of Mencius

If you need the book structure, the works of Mencius, or where to read the text, start from the full-text hub.

Open the full-text hub

Book context

Jin Xin II treats knowing words, knowing destiny, and the judgments proper to mature cultivation together.

Related principles

Citation note

Do not treat it as a dry conceptual chart. Mencius is policing the boundary of accountability so that neither nature nor fate becomes an excuse for evasion.

Passage profile

Book
Jin Xin II
Location
孟子 7B.24
Position
Passage 24 / 38
Alignment confidence
99%