Jin Xin II · Passage 24 / 38 · 孟子 7B.24
Mencius 7B.24: distinction between nature and appointment
Mencius is not playing abstract metaphysics. He is drawing a practical line: natural desire should not be lazily justified as nature.
孟子曰:「口之於味也,目之於色也,耳之於聲也,鼻之於臭也,四肢之於安佚也;性也,有命焉,君子不謂性也。仁之於父子也,義之於君臣也,禮之於賓主也,知之於賢者也,聖人之於天道也;命也,有性焉,君子不謂命也。」
Mencius said, 'For the mouth to desire sweet tastes, the eye to desire beautiful colours, the ear to desire pleasant sounds, the nose to desire fragrant odours, and the four limbs to desire ease and rest - these things are natural. But there is the appointment of Heaven in connexion with them, and the superior man does not say of his pursuit of them, "It is my nature." The exercise of love between father and son, the observance of righteousness between sovereign and minister, the rules of ceremony between guest and host, the display of knowledge in recognising the talented, and the fulfilling the heavenly course by the sage - these are the appointment of Heaven. But there is an adaptation of our nature for them. The superior man does not say, in reference to them, "It is the appointment of Heaven."'
Priority note
A human-edited reading layer
Central question
Why does Mencius say that some things involve appointment but the superior person does not call them nature, while other things involve nature but he does not call them appointment?
Direct answer
Because he wants to block two evasions: one that absolves desire by calling it nature, and one that absolves responsibility by calling it fate. The superior person must judge both correctly.
First principle
Part of mature judgment is refusing easy excuses: neither 'this is just my nature' nor 'this is just fate' may be used to flee responsibility.
Why it matters
This passage is excellent for searches around nature, fate, responsibility, and Mencius's conceptual precision.
Further reading
What this passage is doing
This is passage 24 of 38 in Jin Xin II. The cleanest entry point is "For the mouth to desire sweet tastes, the…". In context, it works as part of Mencius's argument about knowing words, knowing destiny, and the completion of cultivation and can be read alongside Human nature, Flood-like qi.
Broader search routes
If you came here with a wider question, start from the right hub page
Human nature is good: the starting point of moral growth
If your real query is broader than one citation, start from the theme page and use this passage as proof text.
Open human natureWho is Mencius?
If you first need the person, the aliases, and why he matters, start from the about page.
Open About MenciusMencius quotes and sayings
If you arrived through a famous line, start from the quotes hub and then return to the exact passage.
Open Mencius quotesMencius full text and works of Mencius
If you need the book structure, the works of Mencius, or where to read the text, start from the full-text hub.
Open the full-text hubBook context
Jin Xin II treats knowing words, knowing destiny, and the judgments proper to mature cultivation together.
Related principles
Citation note
Do not treat it as a dry conceptual chart. Mencius is policing the boundary of accountability so that neither nature nor fate becomes an excuse for evasion.