孟子 6A.1
Because the analogy implies that becoming virtuous requires twisting, cutting, and damaging what a person already is. Mencius wants to protect the idea that moral growth should unfold from human potential, not from injury to it.
This passage is a crucial negative entry into human goodness. It shows that Mencius is resisting not only one thesis about nature, but an entire engineering view of morality.
孟子 6A.2
Because he is distinguishing two questions: what can be redirected by force, and what its underlying tendency is. Water may be diverted east or west, but it still tends downward. Human beings are also pulled by circumstance without therefore being neutral at the root about good and bad.
This passage strongly serves searches around human nature, the water analogy, Gaozi, and why Mencius still maintains the goodness of human nature.
孟子 6A.3
Because if nature means only being alive and growing, it becomes too broad to explain what is specifically human in moral life. A definition that erases the crucial distinctions explains nothing of consequence.
This passage serves searches around Gaozi, the definition of nature, and why Mencius thinks an overbroad account of human nature fails philosophically.
孟子 6A.4
Because for Mencius righteousness is not a command pasted onto human beings from outside. The very fact that we respond differently to elder brother, elder, and kinship relations shows that the heart already carries a structure for recognizing fittingness and respect.
This passage serves high-intent searches around food and sex, the internal and external debate, and whether Mencius treats righteousness as innate or imposed.
孟子 6A.5
Because the same respect appears in different orderings depending on the relationship at stake. If righteousness were simply injected by outside objects, such discernment would be unintelligible. The decisive factor is whether the heart sees what is fitting in the relation.
This passage serves searches around righteousness as internal, Mencius on moral judgment, and the debate with Gaozi. It is a key bridge from human goodness to concrete ethical discernment.
孟子 6A.6
Because he tests the issue against normal human capacities. If compassion, shame, respect, and moral discernment are generally present, then goodness has an internal ground rather than arriving as an outside addition.
6A.6 is one of the most complete defenses of human goodness in the text. It also maps directly onto the site's strongest current search opportunity around 'human nature is good' and related queries.