滕文公下 · 第 03 / 10 章 · 孟子 3B.3
《孟子·滕文公下》3B.3:古之君子为什么要仕
孟子并不把出仕看成逐位求禄,而把它比作农夫耕田:士失位,就像诸侯失国,说明对有志于道的人来说,公共责任本就是常业。
周霄问曰:「古之君子仕乎?」孟子曰:「仕。传曰:『孔子三月无君,则皇皇如也。出疆必载质。』公明仪曰:『古之人三月无君则吊。』」「三月无君则吊,不以急乎?」曰:「士之失位也,犹诸侯之失国家也。《礼》曰:『诸侯耕助,以供粢盛。夫人蚕缫,以为衣服。牺牲不成,粢盛不洁,衣服不备,不敢以祭。惟士无田,则亦不祭。』牲杀器皿衣服不备,不敢以祭,则不敢以宴,亦不足吊乎?」「出疆必载质,何也?」曰:「士之仕也,犹农夫之耕也。农夫岂为出疆舍其耒耜哉?」曰:「晋国亦仕国也,未尝闻仕如此其急。仕如此其急也,君子之难仕,何也?」曰:「丈夫生而愿为之有室,女子生而愿为之有家。父母之心,人皆有之。不待父母之命、媒妁之言,钻穴隙相窥,逾墙相从,则父母、国人皆贱之。古之人未尝不欲仕也,又恶不由其道。不由其道而往者,与钻穴隙之类也。」
英文参考译文
Zhou Xiao asked Mencius, saying, 'Did superior men of old time take office?' Mencius replied, 'They did. The Record says, "If Confucius was three months without being employed by some ruler, he looked anxious and unhappy. When he passed from the boundary of a State, he was sure to carry with him his proper gift of introduction." Gong Ming Yi said, "Among the ancients, if an officer was three months unemployed by a ruler, he was condoled with."' Xiao said, 'Did not this condoling, on being three months unemployed by a ruler, show a too great urgency?' Mencius answered, 'The loss of his place to an officer is like the loss of his State to a prince. It is said in the Book of Rites, "A prince ploughs himself, and is assisted by the people, to supply the millet for sacrifice. His wife keeps silkworms, and unwinds their cocoons, to make the garments for sacrifice." If the victims be not perfect, the millet not pure, and the dress not complete, he does not presume to sacrifice. "And the scholar who, out of office, has no holy field, in the same way, does not sacrifice. The victims for slaughter, the vessels, and the garments, not being all complete, he does not presume to sacrifice, and then neither may he dare to feel happy." Is there not here sufficient ground also for condolence?' Xiao again asked, 'What was the meaning of Confucius's always carrying his proper gift of introduction with him, when he passed over the boundaries of the State where he had been?' 'An officer's being in office,' was the reply, 'is like the ploughing of a husbandman. Does a husbandman part with his plough, because he goes from one State to another?' Xiao pursued, 'The kingdom of Jin is one, as well as others, of official employments, but I have not heard of anyone being thus earnest about being in office. If there should be this urge why does a superior man make any difficulty about taking it?' Mencius answered, 'When a son is born, what is desired for him is that he may have a wife; when a daughter is born, what is desired for her is that she may have a husband. This feeling of the parents is possessed by all men. If the young people, without waiting for the orders of their parents, and the arrangements of the go-betweens, shall bore holes to steal a sight of each other, or get over the wall to be with each other, then their parents and all other people will despise them. The ancients did indeed always desire to be in office, but they also hated being so by any improper way. To seek office by an improper way is of a class with young people's boring holes.'
重点修订页
人工补强的解释层
核心问题
为什么孟子说,古之君子要仕,而且失位足以令人忧吊?
直接回答
因为在孟子那里,仕不是附带选项,而是有志之士把道落实到公共秩序里的常业。失去这种位置,就像农夫失去耕作工具一样,不只是少了收入,而是少了履道的所在。
第一性原理
真正的职业并不先由报酬定义,而由它是不是一个人实现其根本责任的必要位置来定义。
为什么重要
这章非常适合承接“古之君子仕乎”“为什么要出仕”“office as moral vocation”等搜索问题,也能补强整站对士与公共责任的解释。
延伸阅读
这章在做什么
这章是《滕文公下》第 3 / 10 章,最直接的进入线索是“古之君子仕乎”。放回全卷,它讨论的是分工、教化与社会秩序,并可与仁政互相印证。
更宽的搜索入口
如果你带着更宽的问题进入这一章,先从正确的 hub 页进入
全卷语境
《滕文公下》集中处理分工、教化和社会角色的正当边界。
关联主题
引用提示
不要只摘“古之君子仕乎”。后面把出仕比作农夫之耕,才说明孟子为什么把失位看成可吊之事。