万章下 · 第 07 / 09 章 · 孟子 5B.7

《孟子·万章下》5B.7:往役,义也;往见,不义也

孟子区分‘往役’与‘往见’,说明同样是被召,是否合义取决于你是去履行应尽之事,还是把自己送进不当的人身依附关系。

万章曰:「敢问不见诸侯,何义也?」孟子曰:「在国曰市井之臣,在野曰草莽之臣,皆谓庶人。庶人不传质为臣,不敢见于诸侯,礼也。」万章曰:「庶人,召之役,则往役;君欲见之,召之,则不往见之,何也?」曰:「往役,义也;往见,不义也。且君之欲见之也,何为也哉?」曰:「为其多闻也,为其贤也。」曰:「为其多闻也,则天子不召师,而况诸侯乎?为其贤也,则吾未闻欲见贤而召之也。缪公亟见于子思,曰:『古千乘之国以友士,何如?』子思不悦,曰:『古之人有言曰:「事之云乎」,岂曰友之云乎?』子思之不悦也,岂不曰:『以位,则子,君也,我,臣也,何敢与君友也?以德,则子事我者也,奚可以与我友?』千乘之君求与之友,而不可得也,而况可召与?齐景公田,招虞人以旌;不至,将杀之。『志士不忘在沟壑,勇士不忘丧其元。』孔子奚取焉?取非其招不往也。」曰:「敢问招虞人何以?」曰:「以皮冠。庶人以旃,士以旗,大夫以旌。以大夫之招招虞人,虞人死不敢往;以士之招招庶人,庶人岂敢往哉?况乎以不贤人之招招贤人乎?欲见贤人而不以其道,犹欲其入而闭之门也。夫义,路也;礼,门也。惟君子能由是路,出入是门也。《诗》云:『周道如底,其直如矢;君子所履,小人所视。』」万章曰:「孔子『君命召,不俟驾而行』。然则孔子非与?」曰:「孔子当仕有官职,而以其官召之也。」

wàn zhāng yuē:「gǎn wèn bú jiàn zhū hóu, hé yì yě?」 mèng zǐ yuē:「zài guó yuē shì jǐng zhī chén, zài yě yuē cǎo mǎng zhī chén, jiē wèi shù rén。 shù rén bù chuán zhì wéi chén, bù gǎn jiàn wū zhū hóu, lǐ yě。」 wàn zhāng yuē:「shù rén, zhào zhī yì, zé wǎng yì; jūn yù jiàn zhī, zhào zhī, zé bù wǎng jiàn zhī, hé yě?」 yuē:「wǎng yì, yì yě; wǎng jiàn, bú yì yě。 qiě jūn zhī yù jiàn zhī yě, hé wéi yě zāi?」 yuē:「wéi qí duō wén yě, wéi qí xián yě。」 yuē:「wéi qí duō wén yě, zé tiān zǐ bú zhào shī, ér kuàng zhū hóu hū? wéi qí xián yě, zé wú wèi wén yù jiàn xián ér zhào zhī yě。 móu gōng jí jiàn wū zǐ sī, yuē:『gǔ qiān chéng zhī guó yǐ yǒu shì, hé rú?』 zǐ sī bú yuè, yuē:『gǔ zhī rén yǒu yán yuē:「shì zhī yún hū」, qǐ yuē yǒu zhī yún hū?』 zǐ sī zhī bú yuè yě, qǐ bù yuē:『yǐ wèi, zé zǐ, jūn yě, wǒ, chén yě, hé gǎn yǔ jūn yǒu yě? yǐ dé, zé zǐ shì wǒ zhě yě, xī kě yǐ yǔ wǒ yǒu?』 qiān chéng zhī jūn qiú yǔ zhī yǒu, ér bù kě dé yě, ér kuàng kě zhào yǔ? qí jǐng gōng tián, zhāo yú rén yǐ jīng; bú zhì, jiāng shā zhī。『zhì shì bú wàng zài gōu hè, yǒng shì bú wàng sāng qí yuán。』 kǒng zǐ xī qǔ yān? qǔ fēi qí zhāo bù wǎng yě。」 yuē:「gǎn wèn zhāo yú rén hé yǐ?」 yuē:「yǐ pí guān。 shù rén yǐ zhān, shì yǐ qí, dài fu yǐ jīng。 yǐ dà fū zhī zhāo zhāo yú rén, yú rén sǐ bù gǎn wǎng; yǐ shì zhī zhāo zhāo shù rén, shù rén qǐ gǎn wǎng zāi? kuàng hū yǐ bù xián rén zhī zhāo zhāo xián rén hū? yù jiàn xián rén ér bù yǐ qí dào, yóu yù qí rù ér bì zhī mén yě。 fū yì, lù yě; lǐ, mén yě。 wéi jūn zǐ néng yóu shì lù, chū rù shì mén yě。《shī》 yún:『zhōu dào rú dǐ, qí zhí rú shǐ; jūn zǐ suǒ lǚ, xiǎo rén suǒ shì。』」 wàn zhāng yuē:「kǒng zǐ 『jūn mìng zhào, bú sì jià ér xíng』。 rán zé kǒng zǐ fēi yǔ?」 yuē:「kǒng zǐ dāng shì yǒu guān zhí, ér yǐ qí guān zhào zhī yě。」

英文参考译文

Wan Zhang said, 'I venture to ask what principle of righteousness is involved in a scholar's not going to see the princes?' Mencius replied, 'A scholar residing in the city is called "a minister of the market-place and well," and one residing in the country is called "a minister of the grass and plants." In both cases he is a common man, and it is the rule of propriety that common men, who have not presented the introductory present and become ministers, should not presume to have interviews with the prince.' Wan Zhang said, 'If a common man is called to perform any service, he goes and performs it; how is it that a scholar, when the prince, wishing to see him, calls him to his presence, refuses to go?' Mencius replied, 'It is right to go and perform the service; it would not be right to go and see the prince. And,' added Mencius, 'on what account is it that the prince wishes to see the scholar?' 'Because of his extensive information, or because of his talents and virtue,' was the reply. 'If because of his extensive information,' said Mencius, 'such a person is a teacher, and the sovereign would not call him - how much less may any of the princes do so? If because of his talents and virtue, then I have not heard of any one wishing to see a person with those qualities, and calling him to his presence. During the frequent interviews of the duke Mu with Zi Si, he one day said to him, "Anciently, princes of a thousand chariots have yet been on terms of friendship with scholars - what do you think of such an intercourse?" Zi Si was displeased, and said, "The ancients have said, 'The scholar should be served:' how should they have merely said that he should be made a friend of?" When Zi Si was thus displeased, did he not say within himself, "With regard to our stations, you are sovereign, and I am subject. How can I presume to be on terms of friendship with my sovereign! With regard to our virtue, you ought to make me your master. How can you be on terms of friendship with me?" Thus, when a ruler of a thousand chariots sought to be on terms of friendship with a scholar, he could not obtain his wish - how much less could he call him to his presence! The duke Ching of Qi, once, when he was hunting, called his forester to him by a flag. The forester would not come, and the duke was going to kill him. With reference to this incident, Confucius said, "The determined officer never forgets that his end may be in a ditch or a stream; the brave officer never forgets that he may lose his head." What was it in the forester that Confucius thus approved? He approved his not going to the duke, when summoned by the article which was not appropriate to him.' Zhang said, 'May I ask with what a forester should be summoned?' Mencius replied, 'With a skin cap. A common man should be summoned with a plain banner; a scholar who has taken office, with one having dragons embroidered on it; and a Great officer, with one having feathers suspended from the top of the staff. When the forester was summoned with the article appropriate to the summoning of a Great officer, he would have died rather than presume to go. If a common man were summoned with the article appropriate to the summoning of a scholar, how could he presume to go? How much more may we expect this refusal to go, when a man of talents and virtue is summoned in a way which is inappropriate to his character! When a prince wishes to see a man of talents and virtue, and does not take the proper course to get his wish, it is as if he wished him to enter his palace, and shut the door against him. Now, righteousness is the way, and propriety is the door, but it is only the superior man who can follow this way, and go out and in by this door. It is said in the Book of Poetry, "The way to Zhou is level like a whetstone, And straight as an arrow. The officers tread it, And the lower people see it."' Wan Zhang said, 'When Confucius received the prince's message calling him, he went without waiting for his carriage. Doing so, did Confucius do wrong?' Mencius replied, 'Confucius was in office, and had to observe its appropriate duties. And moreover, he was summoned on the business of his office.'

重点修订页

人工补强的解释层

核心问题

为什么孟子说庶人被召去役可以去,但被召去见诸侯却不去?

直接回答

因为去服役是在承担自己应尽的公共义务,而被召去见,则可能意味着把自己放到一种并不合礼的臣属姿态里。孟子要守的是分位:该做的事可以做,不该进入的位置不能进。

第一性原理

同样是服从召唤,关键不在动作表面,而在这个动作把你放进了什么关系结构。

为什么重要

这章适合承接“往役义也,往见不义”“分位与关系结构”“Mencius on role boundaries”这类搜索,是礼与政治边界判断的重要一段。

这章在做什么

这章是《万章下》第 7 / 9 章,最直接的进入线索是“敢问不见诸侯,何义也”。放回全卷,它讨论的是知人、求学与名实之辨,并可与仁政、浩然之气互相印证。

更宽的搜索入口

如果你带着更宽的问题进入这一章,先从正确的 hub 页进入

仁政:政治的第一目标是安顿民生

如果你的问题其实是一个更宽的主题词,先回主题页,再把这一章当作原文证据来定位。

查看仁政

孟子是谁?

如果你先要确认人物、别名、时代位置和为什么重要,先回孟子简介页。

查看孟子简介

孟子名言与出处

如果你是先从名句进入,再回头找出处和问题脉络,先回名言页。

查看名言页

《孟子》全文与作品结构入口

如果你要的是十四卷结构、全文导航和稳定引用路径,先回全文目录。

查看全文目录

全卷语境

《万章下》偏重知人、求学与名实是否相副的问题。

关联主题

引用提示

不要把它读成拒绝一切接触权力。孟子不是反见君,而是在说明:没有合礼身份与程序的接触,会把人放进错误关系里。

章句资料

卷次
万章下
定位
孟子 5B.7
顺序
第 07 / 09 章
对齐置信度
99%