公孙丑下 · 第 03 / 14 章 · 孟子 2B.3
《孟子·公孙丑下》2B.3:受与不受,关键在礼义
孟子说明受与不受的关键不在银两多少,而在馈赠是否合礼、是否对应真实处境;若无故厚馈,那就不是周给而是收买。
陈臻问曰:「前日于齐,王馈兼金一百而不受;于宋,馈七十镒而受;于薛,馈五十镒而受。前日之不受是,则今日之受非也;今日之受是,则前日之不受非也;夫子必居一于此矣。」孟子曰:「皆是也。当在宋也,予将有远行;行者必以赆,辞曰『馈赆』,予何为不受?当在薛也,予有戒心,辞曰『闻戒故为兵馈之』,予何为不受?若于齐则未有处也。无处而馈之,是货之也;焉有君子而可以货取乎?」
英文参考译文
Chen Zhen asked Mencius, saying, 'Formerly, when you were in Qi, the king sent you a present Of 2,400 taels of fine silver, and you refused to accept it. When you were in Song, 1,680 taels were sent to you, which you accepted; and when you were in Xue, 1,200 taels were sent, which you likewise accepted. If your declining to accept the gift in the first case was right, your accepting it in the latter cases was wrong. If your accepting it in the latter cases was right, your declining to do so in the first case was wrong. You must accept, Master, one of these alternatives.' Mencius said, 'I did right in all the cases. When I was in Song, I was about to take a long journey. Travellers must be provided with what is necessary for their expenses. The prince's message was, 'A present against travelling-expenses." Why should I have declined the gift? When I was in Xue, I was apprehensive for my safety, and taking measures for my protection. The message was, "I have heard that you are taking measures to protect yourself, and send this to help you in procuring arms." Why should I have declined the gift? But when I was in Qi, I had no occasion for money. To send a man a gift when he has no occasion for it, is to bribe him. How is it possible that a superior man should be taken with a bribe?'
重点修订页
人工补强的解释层
核心问题
为什么孟子既有时受礼,有时又拒绝?
直接回答
因为同样是馈赠,含义可能完全不同。出行盘缠、防身兵馈,是对真实需要的合礼周给;无故厚馈,则是在用财货买人。
第一性原理
判断资源关系,先看它在结构里扮演什么角色,而不是先看数额本身。
为什么重要
这章适合承接“孟子受礼”“gift and integrity”“受与不受”这类搜索,也补强站点关于独立人格与资源关系的判断。
延伸阅读
这章在做什么
这章是《公孙丑下》第 3 / 14 章,最直接的进入线索是“前日于齐,王馈兼金一百而不受”。放回全卷,它讨论的是浩然之气、人格判断与公共责任,并可与仁政互相印证。
更宽的搜索入口
如果你带着更宽的问题进入这一章,先从正确的 hub 页进入
全卷语境
《公孙丑下》围绕浩然之气、人格定力和士人的公共责任展开。
关联主题
引用提示
重点不是孟子前后不一致,而是“馈赆”“为兵”“无处而馈”三种语境差异。离开语境,这章就会被误读成个人清高。