告子下 · 第 06 / 16 章 · 孟子 6B.6

《孟子·告子下》6B.6:先名实还是先仁?三子不同道而同归于仁

孟子说明,伯夷、伊尹、柳下惠行迹不同,却都不是把名实放在第一位;关键不在姿态相同,而在最终趋向是否都回到仁。

淳于髡曰:「先名实者,为人也;后名实者,自为也。夫子在三卿之中,名实未加于上下而去之,仁者固如此乎?」孟子曰:「居下位,不以贤事不肖者,伯夷也。五就汤、五就桀者,伊尹也。不恶污君,不辞小官者,柳下惠也。三子者不同道,其趋一也。一者何也?曰仁也。君子亦仁而已矣,何必同?」曰:「鲁缪公之时,公仪子为政,子柳、子思为臣,鲁之削也滋甚。若是乎贤者之无益于国也!」曰:「虞不用百里奚而亡,秦缪公用之而霸。不用贤则亡,削何可得与?」曰:「昔者,王豹处于淇,而河西善讴。绵驹处于高唐,而齐右善歌。华周、杞梁之妻,善哭其夫,而变国俗。有诸内,必形诸外。为其事而无其功者,髡未尝睹之也。是故无贤者也;有则髡必识之。」曰:「孔子为鲁司寇,不用,从而祭,燔肉不至,不税冕而行。不知者以为为肉也;其知者以为为无礼也。乃孔子则欲以微罪行,不欲为茍去。君子之所为,众人固不识也。」

chún yú kūn yuē:「xiān míng shí zhě, wéi rén yě; hòu míng shí zhě, zì wéi yě。 fū zǐ zài sān qīng zhī zhōng, míng shí wèi jiā wū shàng xià ér qù zhī, rén zhě gù rú cǐ hū?」 mèng zǐ yuē:「jū xià wèi, bù yǐ xián shì bú xiào zhě, bó yí yě。 wǔ jiù tāng、 wǔ jiù jié zhě, yī yǐn yě。 bú è wū jūn, bù cí xiǎo guān zhě, liǔ xià huì yě。 sān zǐ zhě bù tóng dào, qí qū yī yě。 yì zhě hé yě? yuē rén yě。 jūn zǐ yì rén ér yǐ yǐ, hé bì tóng?」 yuē:「lǔ móu gōng zhī shí, gōng yí zǐ wéi zhèng, zǐ liǔ、 zǐ sī wéi chén, lǔ zhī xiāo yě zī shèn。 ruò shì hū xián zhě zhī wú yì wū guó yě!」 yuē:「yú bú yòng bǎi lǐ xī ér wáng, qín móu gōng yòng zhī ér bà。 bú yòng xián zé wáng, xiāo hé kě dé yǔ?」 yuē:「xī zhě, wáng bào chǔ wū qí, ér hé xī shàn ōu。 mián jū chǔ wū gāo táng, ér qí yòu shàn gē。 huá zhōu、 qǐ liáng zhī qī, shàn kū qí fū, ér biàn guó sú。 yǒu zhū nèi, bì xíng zhū wài。 wéi qí shì ér wú qí gōng zhě, kūn wèi cháng dǔ zhī yě。 shì gù wú xián zhě yě; yǒu zé kūn bì shí zhī。」 yuē:「kǒng zǐ wéi lǔ sī kòu, bú yòng, cóng ér jì, fán ròu bú zhì, bú shuì miǎn ér xíng。 bù zhī zhě yǐ wéi wéi ròu yě; qí zhī zhě yǐ wéi wéi wú lǐ yě。 nǎi kǒng zǐ zé yù yǐ wēi zuì xíng, bú yù wéi jì qù。 jūn zǐ zhī suǒ wéi, zhòng rén gù bù shí yě。」

英文参考译文

Chun Yu Kun said, 'He who makes fame and meritorious services his first objects, acts with a regard to others. He who makes them only secondary objects, acts with a regard to himself. You, master, were ranked among the three chief ministers of the State, but before your fame and services had reached either to the prince or the people, you have left your place. Is this indeed the way of the benevolent?' Mencius replied, 'There was Bo Yi - he abode in an inferior situation, and would not, with his virtue, serve a degenerate prince. There was Yi Yin - he five times went to Tang, and five times went to Jie. There was Hui of Liu Xia - he did not disdain to serve a vile prince, nor did he decline a small office. The courses pursued by those three worthies were different, but their aim was one. And what was their one aim? We must answer "To be perfectly virtuous." And so it is simply after this that superior men strive. Why must they all pursue the same course?' Kun pursued, 'In the time of the duke Mu of Lu, the government was in the hands of Gong Yi, while Zi Liu and Zi Si were ministers. And yet, the dismemberment of Lu then increased exceedingly. Such was the case, a specimen how your men of virtue are of no advantage to a kingdom!' Mencius said, 'The prince of Yu did not use Bai Li Xi, and thereby lost his State. The duke Mu of Qin used him, and became chief of all the princes. Ruin is the consequence of not employing men of virtue and talents - how can it rest with dismemberment merely?' Kun urged again, 'Formerly, when Wang Bao dwelt on the Qi, the people on the west of the Yellow River all became skilful at singing in his abrupt manner. When Mian Ju lived in Gao Tang, the people in the parts of Qi on the west became skilful at singing in his prolonged manner. The wives of Hua Zhou and Qi Liang bewailed their husbands so skilfully, that they changed the manners of the State. When there is the gift within, it manifests itself without. I have never seen the man who could do the deeds of a worthy, and did not realize the work of one. Therefore there are now no men of talents and virtue. If there were, I should know them.' Mencius answered, 'When Confucius was chief minister of Justice in Lu, the prince came not to follow his counsels. Soon after there was the solstitial sacrifice, and when a part of the flesh presented in sacrifice was not sent to him, he went away even without taking off his cap of ceremony. Those who did not know him supposed it was on account of the flesh. Those who knew him supposed that it was on account of the neglect of the usual ceremony. The fact was, that Confucius wanted to go away on occasion of some small offence, not wishing to do so without some apparent cause. All men cannot be expected to understand the conduct of a superior man.'

重点修订页

人工补强的解释层

核心问题

为什么孟子说伯夷、伊尹、柳下惠不同道,却同归于仁?

直接回答

因为判断一个人,不该只看外在路径像不像,而要看他究竟把什么放在最前。有人去污君,有人就汤就桀,有人不辞小官,形式不同,但若真正第一位都是仁,那么最终趋向是一的。

第一性原理

同一原则可以在不同情势中呈现不同路径;判断统一性,要看最深优先级,而不是外表动作是否整齐划一。

为什么重要

这章适合承接“伯夷 伊尹 柳下惠”“不同道而同归于仁”“plural forms of integrity”这类搜索,是处理原则一致与路径多样的重要材料。

这章在做什么

这章是《告子下》第 6 / 16 章,最直接的进入线索是“先名实者,为人也”。放回全卷,它讨论的是养心、判断与人格形成,并可与仁政互相印证。

更宽的搜索入口

如果你带着更宽的问题进入这一章,先从正确的 hub 页进入

仁政:政治的第一目标是安顿民生

如果你的问题其实是一个更宽的主题词,先回主题页,再把这一章当作原文证据来定位。

查看仁政

孟子是谁?

如果你先要确认人物、别名、时代位置和为什么重要,先回孟子简介页。

查看孟子简介

孟子名言与出处

如果你是先从名句进入,再回头找出处和问题脉络,先回名言页。

查看名言页

《孟子》全文与作品结构入口

如果你要的是十四卷结构、全文导航和稳定引用路径,先回全文目录。

查看全文目录

全卷语境

《告子下》把养心、判断和人格形成连成一条修身路线。

关联主题

引用提示

不要把它读成相对主义。孟子不是说怎么做都行,而是说不同情势下合仁的路径可能不同,但判断标准仍是同一个。

章句资料

卷次
告子下
定位
孟子 6B.6
顺序
第 06 / 16 章
对齐置信度
99%