告子下 · 第 01 / 16 章 · 孟子 6B.1
《孟子·告子下》6B.1:礼与食孰重,为什么要揣其本
孟子指出,很多尖锐提问其实是把轻重刻意错配:不揣其本,只齐其末,就能把任何原则问成笑话,但这并不是真正的思考。
任人有问屋庐子曰:「礼与食孰重?」曰:「礼重。」「色与礼孰重?」曰:「礼重。」曰:「以礼食则饥而死,不以礼食则得食,必以礼乎?亲迎则不得妻,不亲迎则得妻,必亲迎乎?」屋庐子不能对。明日之邹以告孟子。孟子曰:「于答是也何有?不揣其本,而齐其末,方寸之木可使高于岑楼。金重于羽者,岂谓一钩金与一舆羽之谓哉?取食之重者与礼之轻者而比之,奚翅食重?取色之重者与礼之轻者而比之,奚翅色重?往应之曰,『紾兄之臂而夺之食,则得食,不紾,则不得食,则将紾之乎?逾东家墙而搂其处子,则得妻,不搂,则不得妻,则将搂之乎?』」
英文参考译文
A man of Ren asked the disciple Wu Lu, saying, 'Is an observance of the rules of propriety in regard to eating, or eating merely, the more important?' The answer was, 'The observance of the rules of propriety is the more important.' 'Is the gratifying the appetite of sex, or the doing so only according to the rules of propriety, the more important?' The answer again was, 'The observance of the rules of propriety in the matter is the more important.' The man pursued, 'If the result of eating only according to the rules of propriety will be death by starvation, while by disregarding those rules we may get food, must they still be observed in such a case? If according to the rule that he shall go in person to meet his wife a man cannot get married, while by disregarding that rule he may get married, must he still observe the rule in such a case?' Wu Lu was unable to reply to these questions, and the next day he went to Zou, and told them to Mencius. Mencius said, 'What difficulty is there in answering these inquiries? If you do not adjust them at their lower extremities, but only put their tops on a level, a piece of wood an inch square may be made to be higher than the pointed peak of a high building. Gold is heavier than feathers; but does that saying have reference, on the one hand, to a single clasp of gold, and, on the other, to a waggon-load of feathers? If you take a case where the eating is of the utmost importance and the observing the rules of propriety is of little importance, and compare the things together, why stop with saying merely that the eating is more important? So, taking the case where the gratifying the appetite of sex is of the utmost importance and the observing the rules of propriety is of little importance, why stop with merely saying that the gratifying the appetite is the more important? Go and answer him thus, "If, by twisting your elder brother's arm, and snatching from him what he is eating, you can get food for yourself, while, if you do not do so, you will not get anything to eat, will you so twist his arm? If by getting over your neighbour's wall, and dragging away his virgin daughter, you can get a wife, while if you do not do so, you will not be able to get a wife, will you so drag her away?"'
重点修订页
人工补强的解释层
核心问题
为什么孟子说回答“礼与食孰重”并不难,关键在“揣其本”?
直接回答
因为若故意拿极端情境中的‘食之重’去和最轻层次的‘礼’相比,结论当然会失真。孟子要恢复的是判断比例,而不是让概念在错位比较里崩掉。
第一性原理
很多伪问题不是问题真的难,而是提问者先把比较尺度做坏了。
为什么重要
这章非常适合承接“礼与食孰重”“极端例子反驳原则”“Mencius on false comparisons”这类搜索,也能强化站点的方法论层面。
延伸阅读
这章在做什么
这章是《告子下》第 1 / 16 章,最直接的进入线索是“礼与食孰重”。放回全卷,它讨论的是养心、判断与人格形成,并可与仁政互相印证。
更宽的搜索入口
如果你带着更宽的问题进入这一章,先从正确的 hub 页进入
全卷语境
《告子下》把养心、判断和人格形成连成一条修身路线。
关联主题
引用提示
不要把这章只当辩论技巧。孟子真正守的是:原则判断必须在合适尺度上比较,否则看似机智的问题只是在偷换轻重。