万章上 · 第 08 / 09 章 · 孟子 5A.8
《孟子·万章上》5A.8:孔子不会靠可疑寄主去换官位
面对孔子寄居痈疽、侍人之家的传言,孟子断然否认:孔子进退以礼义,不会为了求位而把自己安在不正当的依附关系里。
万章问曰:「或谓『孔子于卫主痈疽,于齐主侍人瘠环』,有诸乎?」孟子曰:「否,不然也,好事者为之也。于卫,主颜雠由。弥子之妻与子路之妻,兄弟也。弥子谓子路曰:『孔子主我,卫卿可得也。』子路以告,孔子曰:『有命。』孔子进以礼,退以义,得之不得曰:『有命』。而主痈疽与侍人瘠环,是无义无命也。孔子不悦于鲁卫,遭宋桓司马,将要而杀之,微服而过宋。是时孔子当厄,主司城贞子,为陈侯周臣。吾闻观近臣,以其所为主;观远臣,以其所主。若孔子主痈疽与侍人瘠环,何以为孔子?」
英文参考译文
Wan Zhang asked Mencius, saying, 'Some say that Confucius, when he was in Wei, lived with the ulcer-doctor, and when he was in Qi, with the attendant, Qi Huan; was it so?' Mencius replied, 'No; it was not so. Those are the inventions of men fond of strange things. When he was in Wei, he lived with Yan Chou You. The wives of the officer Mi and Zi Lu were sisters, and Mi told Zi Lu, "If Confucius will lodge with me, he may attain to the dignity of a high noble of Wei." Zi Lu informed Confucius of this, and he said, "That is as ordered by Heaven." Confucius went into office according to propriety, and retired from it according to righteousness. In regard to his obtaining office or not obtaining it, he said, "That is as ordered." But if he had lodged with the attendant Qi Huan, that would neither have been according to righteousness, nor any ordering of Heaven. When Confucius, being dissatisfied in Lu and Wei, had left those States, he met with the attempt of Hwan, the Master of the Horse, of Song, to intercept and kill him. He assumed, however, the dress of a common man, and passed by Song. At that time, though he was in circumstances of distress, he lodged with the city-master Chang, who was then a minister of Zhou, the marquis of Chen. I have heard that the characters of ministers about court may be discerned from those whom they entertain, and those of stranger officers, from those with whom they lodge. If Confucius had lodged with the ulcer-doctor, and with the attendant Qi Huan, how could he have been Confucius?'
重点修订页
人工补强的解释层
核心问题
为什么孟子坚决否认孔子曾寄主于痈疽或侍人瘠环?
直接回答
因为孔子若真靠这种关系去求进身,就等于把礼义与命都丢了。一个人住在谁家,不只是生活细节,也在公开表明自己认可什么样的关系入口。
第一性原理
人格与政治选择,不只体现在说什么,也体现在愿意把自己安放在哪些人和哪些门路之下。
为什么重要
这章适合承接“孔子主痈疽”“寄主与人格”“lodging and moral alignment in Mencius”这类搜索,也能补强本站对士与权力入口的解释。
延伸阅读
这章在做什么
这章是《万章上》第 8 / 9 章,最直接的进入线索是“或谓孔子于卫主痈疽,于齐主侍人瘠环,…”。放回全卷,它讨论的是臣道、忠告与政治担当,并可与浩然之气互相印证。
更宽的搜索入口
如果你带着更宽的问题进入这一章,先从正确的 hub 页进入
全卷语境
《万章上》反复讨论臣道、忠告和政治责任的边界。
关联主题
引用提示
不要把它看成八卦辟谣而已。孟子借辟谣说明:谁可为寄主,本身就是对一个人道德取向的公开判断。