梁惠王下 · 第 05 / 16 章 · 孟子 1B.5
《孟子·梁惠王下》1B.5:明堂可毁乎,先问王政可行乎
孟子并不把明堂当成死文物,而是把它视为王政秩序的制度载体:若真想行王政,就不该先把承载秩序的器物与礼制毁掉。
齐宣王问曰:「人皆谓我毁明堂,毁诸?已乎?」孟子对曰:「夫明堂者,王者之堂也。王欲行王政,则勿毁之矣。」王曰:「王政可得闻与?」对曰:「昔者文王之治岐也,耕者九一,仕者世禄,关市讥而不征,泽梁无禁,罪人不孥。老而无妻曰鳏,老而无夫曰寡,老而无子曰独,幼而无父曰孤。此四者,天下之穷民而无告者。文王发政施仁,必先斯四者。诗云,『哿矣富人,哀此茕独。』」王曰:「善哉言乎!」曰:「王如善之,则何为不行?」王曰:「寡人有疾,寡人好货。」对曰:「昔者公刘好货,《诗》云:『乃积乃仓,乃裹糇粮,于橐于囊。思戢用光。弓矢斯张,干戈戚扬,爰方启行。』故居者有积仓,行者有裹粮也,然后可以爰方启行。王如好货,与百姓同之,于王何有?」王曰:「寡人有疾,寡人好色。」对曰:「昔者大王好色,爱厥妃。《诗》云:『古公亶父,来朝走马;率西水浒,至于岐下;爰及姜女,聿来胥宇。』当是时也,内无怨女,外无旷夫;王如好色,与百姓同之,于王何有?」
英文参考译文
The king Xuan of Qi said, 'People all tell me to pull down and remove the Hall of Distinction. Shall I pull it down, or stop the movement for that object?' Mencius replied, 'The Hall of Distinction is a Hall appropriate to the sovereigns. If your Majesty wishes to practise the true royal government, then do not pull it down.' The king said, 'May I hear from you what the true royal government is?' 'Formerly,' was the reply, 'king Wen's government of Qi was as follows: The husbandmen cultivated for the government one-ninth of the land; the descendants of officers were salaried; at the passes and in the markets, strangers were inspected, but goods were not taxed: there were no prohibitions respecting the ponds and weirs; the wives and children of criminals were not involved in their guilt. There were the old and wifeless, or widowers; the old and husbandless, or widows; the old and childless, or solitaries; the young and fatherless, or orphans - these four classes are the most destitute of the people, and have none to whom they can tell their wants, and king Wen, in the institution of his government with its benevolent action, made them the first objects of his regard, as it is said in the Book of Poetry, "The rich may get through life well; But alas! for the miserable and solitary!"' The king said, 'O excellent words!' Mencius said, 'Since your Majesty deems them excellent, why do you not practise them?' 'I have an infirmity,' said the king; 'I am fond of wealth.' The reply was, 'Formerly, Gong Liu was fond of wealth. It is said in the Book of Poetry, "He reared his ricks, and filled his granaries, He tied up dried provisions and grain, In bottomless bags, and sacks, That he might gather his people together, and glorify his State. With bows and arrows all-displayed, With shields, and spears, and battle-axes, large and small, He commenced his march." In this way those who remained in their old seat had their ricks and granaries, and those who marched had their bags of provisions. It was not till after this that he thought he could begin his march. If your Majesty loves wealth, give the people power to gratify the same feeling, and what difficulty will there be in your attaining the royal sway?' The king said, 'I have an infirmity; I am fond of beauty.' The reply was, 'Formerly, king Tai was fond of beauty, and loved his wife. It is said in the Book of Poetry, "Gu Gong Tan Fu, Came in the morning, galloping his horse, By the banks of the western waters, As far as the foot of Qi hill, Along with the lady of Jiang; They came and together chose the site for their settlement." At that time, in the seclusion of the house, there were no dissatisfied women, and abroad, there were no unmarried men. If your Majesty loves beauty, let the people be able to gratify the same feeling, and what difficulty will there be in your attaining the royal sway?'
重点修订页
人工补强的解释层
核心问题
为什么孟子劝齐宣王不要轻易毁明堂?
直接回答
因为问题不在一座建筑值不值得留,而在你是否还想保留它所承载的王政秩序。若没有更好的正当秩序替代,先毁制度容器,只会让政治进一步失去方向。
第一性原理
改革不能只问旧形式是否老旧,还要问这个形式原本在保护什么结构;若结构仍有价值,轻率拆毁往往先伤到根。
为什么重要
这章适合承接“明堂可毁乎”“王政”“institution and legitimacy”这类搜索,也补强整站对制度、礼制与政治秩序的解释。
延伸阅读
这章在做什么
这章是《梁惠王下》第 5 / 16 章,最直接的进入线索是“人皆谓我毁明堂,毁诸”。放回全卷,它讨论的是与民同乐、战争判断与政治责任,并可与四端、仁政互相印证。
更宽的搜索入口
如果你带着更宽的问题进入这一章,先从正确的 hub 页进入
全卷语境
《梁惠王下》把与民同乐、战争选择和君主责任放到同一条政治判断链上。
引用提示
不要把它读成保守主义口号。孟子不是为古建筑本身辩护,而是在追问:你要拿什么更好的秩序来替代它?