公孙丑上 · 第 02 / 09 章 · 孟子 2A.2
《孟子·公孙丑上》2A.2:四十不动心与浩然之气
孟子在 2A.2 讨论不动心、勇敢与浩然之气,指出真正的定力不是硬撑,而是长期合义之后形成的稳定精神力量。
公孙丑问曰:「夫子加齐之卿相,得行道焉,虽由此霸王不异矣。如此则动心否乎?」孟子曰:「否,我四十不动心。」曰:「若是则夫子过孟贲远矣。」曰:「是不难。告子先我不动心。」曰:「不动心有道乎?」曰:「有。北宫黝之养勇也,不肤桡,不目逃。思以一豪挫于人,若挞之于市朝。不受于褐宽博,亦不受于万乘之君。视刺万乘之君若刺褐夫。无严诸侯。恶声至,必反之。孟施舍之所养勇也,曰:『视不胜犹胜也。量敌而后进,虑胜而后会,是畏三军者也。舍岂能为必胜哉?能无惧而已矣。』孟施舍似曾子,北宫黝似子夏。夫二子之勇,未知其孰贤,然而孟施舍守约也。昔者曾子谓子襄曰:『子好勇乎?吾尝闻大勇于夫子矣:自反而不缩,虽褐宽博,吾不惴焉;自反而缩,虽千万人吾往矣。』孟施舍之守气,又不如曾子之守约也。」曰:「敢问夫子之不动心与告子之不动心,可得闻与?」「告子曰:『不得于言,勿求于心;不得于心,勿求于气。』不得于心,勿求于气,可;不得于言,勿求于心,不可。夫志,气之帅也;气,体之充也。夫志至焉,气次焉。故曰:持其志,无暴其气。」「既曰『志,至焉;气,次焉』,又曰『持其志,无暴其气』者,何也?」曰:「志壹则动气;气壹则动志也。今夫蹶者趋者是气也而反动其心。」「敢问夫子恶乎长?」曰:「我知言,我善养吾浩然之气。」「敢问何谓浩然之气?」曰:「难言也。其为气也至大至刚,以直养而无害,则塞于天地之间。其为气也配义与道,无是馁也。是集义所生者,非义袭而取之也。行有不慊于心则馁矣。我故曰:告子未尝知义。以其外之也。必有事焉而勿正,心勿忘,勿助长也。无若宋人然。宋人有闵其苗之不长而揠之者,芒芒然归,谓其人曰:『今日病矣!予助苗长矣!』其子趋而往视之,苗则槁矣!天下之不助苗长者寡矣。以为无益而舍之者,不耘苗者也。助之长者,揠苗者也,非徒无益,而又害之。」「何谓知言?」曰:「诐辞知其所蔽,淫辞知其所陷,邪辞知其所离,遁辞知其所穷。生于其心,害于其政;发于其政,害于其事。圣人复起,必从吾言矣。」「宰我、子贡善为说辞,冉牛、闵子、颜渊善言德行;孔子兼之,曰:『我于辞命,则不能也。』然则夫子既圣矣乎?」曰:「恶!是何言也!昔者子贡问于孔子曰:『夫子圣矣乎?』孔子曰:『圣则吾不能,我学不厌而教不倦也。』子贡曰:『学不厌,智也;教不倦,仁也。仁且智,夫子既圣矣。』夫圣,孔子不居,是何言也?」「昔者窃闻之:子夏、子游、子张皆有圣人之一体,冉牛、闵子、颜渊则具体而微,敢问所安?」曰:「姑舍是。」曰:「伯夷、伊尹何如?」曰:「不同道。非其君不事,非其民不使,治则进,乱则退,伯夷也。何事非君?何使非民?治亦进,乱亦进,伊尹也。可以仕则仕,可以止则止,可以久则久,可以速则速,孔子也。皆古圣人也。吾未能有行焉,乃所愿,则学孔子也。」「伯夷、伊尹于孔子,若是班乎?」曰:「否,自有生民以来,未有孔子也。」曰:「然则有同与?」曰:「有。得百里之地而君之,皆能以朝诸侯,有天下。行一不义、杀一不辜而得天下,皆不为也。是则同。」曰:「敢问其所以异?」曰:「宰我、子贡、有若,智足以知圣人;污,不至阿其所好。宰我曰:『以予观于夫子,贤于尧、舜远矣。』子贡曰:『见其礼而知其政,闻其乐而知其德。由百世之后,等百世之王,莫之能违也。自生民以来,未有夫子也。』有若曰:『岂惟民哉!麒麟之于走兽,凤凰之于飞鸟,泰山之于丘垤,河海之于行潦,类也。圣人之于民,亦类也。出于其类,拔乎其萃。自生民以来,未有盛于孔子也。』」
英文参考译文
Gong Sun Chou asked Mencius, saying, 'Master, if you were to be appointed a high noble and the prime minister of Qi, so as to be able to carry your principles into practice, though you should thereupon raise the ruler to the headship of all the other princes, or even to the royal dignity, it would not be to be wondered at. In such a position would your mind be perturbed or not?' Mencius replied, 'No. At forty, I attained to an unperturbed mind.' Chou said, 'Since it is so with you, my Master, you are far beyond Meng Ben.' 'The mere attainment,' said Mencius, 'is not difficult. The scholar Gao had attained to an unperturbed mind at an earlier period of life than I did.' Chou asked, 'Is there any way to an unperturbed mind?' The answer was, 'Yes. Bei Gong You had this way of nourishing his valour: He did not flinch from any strokes at his body. He did not turn his eyes aside from any thrusts at them. He considered that the slightest push from any one was the same as if he were beaten before the crowds in the market-place, and that what he would not receive from a common man in his loose large garments of hair, neither should he receive from a prince of ten thousand chariots. He viewed stabbing a prince of ten thousand chariots just as stabbing a fellow dressed in cloth of hair. He feared not any of all the princes. A bad word addressed to him be always returned. Meng Shi She had this way of nourishing his valour: He said, "I look upon not conquering and conquering in the same way. To measure the enemy and then advance; to calculate the chances of victory and then engage - this is to stand in awe of the opposing force. How can I make certain of conquering? I can only rise superior to all fear." Meng Shi She resembled the philosopher Zeng. Bei Gong You resembled Zi Xia. I do not know to the valour of which of the two the superiority should be ascribed, but yet Meng Shi She attended to what was of the greater importance. Formerly, the philosopher Zeng said to Zi Xiang, "Do you love valour? I heard an account of great valour from the Master. It speaks thus: 'If, on self-examination, I find that I am not upright, shall I not be in fear even of a poor man in his loose garments of hair-cloth? If, on self-examination, I find that I am upright, I will go forward against thousands and tens of thousands.' Yet, what Meng Shi She maintained, being merely his physical energy, was after all inferior to what the philosopher Zeng maintained, which was indeed of the most importance.' Gong Sun Chou said, 'May I venture to ask an explanation from you, Master, of how you maintain an unperturbed mind, and how the philosopher Gao does the same?' Mencius answered, 'Gao says, "What is not attained in words is not to be sought for in the mind; what produces dissatisfaction in the mind, is not to be helped by passion-effort." This last, when there is unrest in the mind, not to seek for relief from passion-effort, may be conceded. But not to seek in the mind for what is not attained in words cannot be conceded. The will is the leader of the passion-nature. The passion-nature pervades and animates the body. The will is first and chief, and the passion-nature is subordinate to it. Therefore I say, Maintain firm the will, and do no violence to the passion-nature.' Chou observed, 'Since you say "The will is chief, and the passion-nature is subordinate," how do you also say, "Maintain firm the will, and do no violence to the passion-nature?"' Mencius replied, 'When it is the will alone which is active, it moves the passion-nature. When it is the passion-nature alone which is active, it moves the will. For instance now, in the case of a man falling or running, that is from the passion-nature, and yet it moves the mind.' 'I venture to ask,' said Chou again, 'wherein you, Master, surpass Gao.' Mencius told him, 'I understand words. I am skilful in nourishing my vast, flowing passion-nature.' Chou pursued, 'I venture to ask what you mean by your vast, flowing passion-nature!' The reply was, 'It is difficult to describe it. This is the passion-nature: It is exceedingly great, and exceedingly strong. Being nourished by rectitude, and sustaining no injury, it fills up all between heaven and earth. This is the passion-nature: It is the mate and assistant of righteousness and reason. Without it, man is in a state of starvation. It is produced by the accumulation of righteous deeds; it is not to be obtained by incidental acts of righteousness. If the mind does not feel complacency in the conduct, the nature becomes starved. I therefore said, "Gao has never understood righteousness, because he makes it something external." There must be the constant practice of this righteousness, but without the object of thereby nourishing the passion-nature. Let not the mind forget its work, but let there be no assisting the growth of that nature. Let us not be like the man of Song. There was a man of Song, who was grieved that his growing corn was not longer, and so he pulled it up. Having done this, he returned home, looking very stupid, and said to his people, "I am tired to-day. I have been helping the corn to grow long." His son ran to look at it, and found the corn all withered. There are few in the world, who do not deal with their passion-nature, as if they were assisting the corn to grow long. Some indeed consider it of no benefit to them, and let it alone - they do not weed their corn. They who assist it to grow long, pull out their corn. What they do is not only of no benefit to the nature, but it also injures it.' Gong Sun Chou further asked, 'What do you mean by saying that you understand whatever words you hear?' Mencius replied, 'When words are one-sided, I know how the mind of the speaker is clouded over. When words are extravagant, I know how the mind is fallen and sunk. When words are all-depraved, I know how the mind has departed from principle. When words are evasive, I know how the mind is at its wit's end. These evils growing in the mind, do injury to government, and, displayed in the government, are hurtful to the conduct of affairs. When a Sage shall again arise, he will certainly follow my words.' On this Chou observed, 'Zai Wo and Zi Gong were skilful in speaking. Ran Niu, the disciple Min, and Yan Yuan, while their words were good, were distinguished for their virtuous conduct. Confucius united the qualities of the disciples in himself, but still he said, "In the matter of speeches, I am not competent." Then, Master, have you attained to be a Sage?' Mencius said, 'Oh! what words are these? Formerly Zi Gong asked Confucius, saying, "Master, are you a Sage?" Confucius answered him, "A Sage is what I cannot rise to. I learn without satiety, and teach without being tired." Zi Gong said, "You learn without satiety - that shows your wisdom. You teach without being tired - that shows your benevolence. Benevolent and wise - Master, you ARE a Sage." Now, since Confucius would not allow himself to be regarded as a Sage, what words were those?' Chou said, 'Formerly, I once heard this: Zi Xia, Zi You, and Zi Zhang had each one member of the Sage. Ran Niu, the disciple Min, and Yan Yuan had all the members, but in small proportions. I venture to ask, With which of these are you pleased to rank yourself?' Mencius replied, 'Let us drop speaking about these, if you please.' Chou then asked, 'What do you say of Bo Yi and Yi Yin?' 'Their ways were different from mine,' said Mencius. 'Not to serve a prince whom he did not esteem, nor command a people whom he did not approve; in a time of good government to take office, and on the occurrence of confusion to retire - this was the way of Bo Yi. To say "Whom may I not serve? My serving him makes him my ruler. What people may I not command? My commanding them makes them my people." In a time of good government to take office, and when disorder prevailed, also to take office - that was the way of Yi Yin. When it was proper to go into office, then to go into it; when it was proper to keep retired from office, then to keep retired from it; when it was proper to continue in it long, then to continue in it long - when it was proper to withdraw from it quickly, then to withdraw quickly - that was the way of Confucius. These were all sages of antiquity, and I have not attained to do what they did. But what I wish to do is to learn to be like Confucius.' Chou said, 'Comparing Bo Yi and Yi Yin with Confucius, are they to be placed in the same rank?' Mencius replied, 'No. Since there were living men until now, there never was another Confucius.' Chou said, 'Then, did they have any points of agreement with him?' The reply was, 'Yes. If they had been sovereigns over a hundred li of territory, they would, all of them, have brought all the princes to attend in their court, and have obtained the throne. And none of them, in order to obtain the throne, would have committed one act of unrighteousness, or put to death one innocent person. In those things they agreed with him.' Chou said, 'I venture to ask wherein he differed from them.' Mencius replied, 'Zai Wo, Zi Gong, and You Ruo had wisdom sufficient to know the sage. Even had they been ranking themselves low, they would not have demeaned themselves to flatter their favourite. Now, Zai Wo said, "According to my view of our Master, he was far superior to Yao and Shun." Zi Gong said, "By viewing the ceremonial ordinances of a prince, we know the character of his government. By hearing his music, we know the character of his virtue. After the lapse of a hundred ages I can arrange, according to their merits, the kings of a hundred ages - not one of them can escape me. From the birth of mankind till now, there has never been another like our Master." You Ruo said, "Is it only among men that it is so? There is the Qi-lin among quadrupeds, the Feng-huang among birds, the Tai mountain among mounds and ant-hills, and rivers and seas among rain-pools. Though different in degree, they are the same in kind. So the sages among mankind are also the same in kind. But they stand out from their fellows, and rise above the level, and from the birth of mankind till now, there never has been one so complete as Confucius."'
重点修订页
人工补强的解释层
核心问题
孟子的“不动心”为什么不是情绪压抑或逞强?
直接回答
因为他讨论的不是把恐惧压下去,而是让判断、行动与义长期一致,于是关键时刻不需要靠意志硬顶,心自然能站住。
第一性原理
精神力量不是额外外挂,而是长期行为与价值判断不冲突时自然积累出来的结果。
为什么重要
这章是理解浩然之气的入口。它把“勇敢”从人格标签改写成可培养的结构,也解释了为什么孟子把修身看成公共行动的前提。
延伸阅读
这章在做什么
这章是《公孙丑上》第 2 / 9 章,最直接的进入线索是“夫子加齐之卿相,得行道焉,虽由此霸王…”。放回全卷,它讨论的是四端、性善与王道根据,并可与性善、仁政、浩然之气互相印证。
更宽的搜索入口
如果你带着更宽的问题进入这一章,先从正确的 hub 页进入
全卷语境
《公孙丑上》是理解四端、性善与仁政根据的关键卷次。
引用提示
引用“不动心”时,最好连到后文养气与知言的讨论,否则容易把它误读成单纯的心理训练技巧。