公孙丑下 · 第 09 / 14 章 · 孟子 2B.9
《孟子·公孙丑下》2B.9:燕人畔后,为什么孟子不肯替齐王开脱
孟子拒绝用“周公也未尽仁智”来替齐王失败找台阶,说明真正的责任判断不靠历史类比开脱,而要回到当下决策本身是否合义合智。
燕人畔,王曰:「吾甚惭于孟子。」陈贾曰:「王无患焉,王自以为与周公,孰仁且智?」王曰:「恶!是何言也!」曰:「周公使管叔监殷,管叔以殷畔。知而使之,是不仁也;不知而使之,是不智也。仁智,周公未之尽也,而况于王乎?贾请见而解之。」见孟子问曰:「周公何人也?」曰:「古圣人也。」曰:「使管叔监殷,管叔以殷畔也,有诸?」曰:「然。」曰:「周公知其将畔而使之与?」曰:「不知也。」「然则圣人且有过与?」曰:「周公,弟也;管叔,兄也。周公之过,不亦宜乎?且古之君子,过则改之;今之君子,过则顺之。古之君子,其过也如日月之食,民皆见之;及其更也,民皆仰之。今之君子,岂徒顺之?又从为之辞。」
英文参考译文
The people of Yan having rebelled, the king of Qi said, 'I feel very much ashamed when I think of Mencius.' Chen Jia said to him, 'Let not your Majesty be grieved. Whether does your Majesty consider yourself or Zhou Gong the more benevolent and wise?' The king replied, 'Oh! what words are those?' 'The duke of Zhou,' said Jia, 'appointed Guan Shu to oversee the heir of Yin, but Guan Shu with the power of the Yin State rebelled. If knowing that this would happen he appointed Guan Shu, he was deficient in benevolence. If he appointed him, not knowing that it would happen, he was deficient in knowledge. If the duke of Zhou was not completely benevolent and wise, how much less can your Majesty be expected to be so! I beg to go and see Mencius, and relieve your Majesty from that feeling.' Chen Jia accordingly saw Mencius, and asked him, saying, 'What kind of man was the duke of Zhou?' 'An ancient sage,' was the reply. 'Is it the fact, that he appointed Guan Shu to oversee the heir of Yin, and that Guan Shu with the State of Yin rebelled?' 'It is.' 'Did the duke of Zhou know that he would rebel, and purposely appoint him to that office?' Mencius said, 'He did not know.' 'Then, though a sage, he still fell into error?' 'The duke of Zhou,' answered Mencius, 'was the younger brother. Guan Shu was his elder brother. Was not the error of Zhou Gong in accordance with what is right? Moreover, when the superior men of old had errors, they reformed them. The superior men of the present time, when they have errors, persist in them. The errors of the superior men of old were like eclipses of the sun and moon. All the people witnessed them, and when they had reformed them, all the people looked up to them with their former admiration. But do the superior men of the present day only persist in their errors? They go on to apologize for them likewise.'
重点修订页
人工补强的解释层
核心问题
为什么孟子面对燕国之乱,不接受替齐王开脱的说法?
直接回答
因为拿古人也会失误来冲淡现实责任,只会让判断失焦。孟子关心的不是给失败找可接受的比附,而是追问这次决策本身是否真的合于仁与智。
第一性原理
责任判断的核心,不是证明别人也犯过类似错误,而是回到这次行动是否站得住。
为什么重要
这章适合承接“燕人畔”“孟子 责任判断”“historical analogy and excuse”这类搜索,是理解孟子如何处理政治羞惭与责任的重要章句。
延伸阅读
这章在做什么
这章是《公孙丑下》第 9 / 14 章,最直接的进入线索是“吾甚惭于孟子”。放回全卷,它讨论的是浩然之气、人格判断与公共责任,并可与仁政互相印证。
更宽的搜索入口
如果你带着更宽的问题进入这一章,先从正确的 hub 页进入
全卷语境
《公孙丑下》围绕浩然之气、人格定力和士人的公共责任展开。
关联主题
引用提示
不要把它当作纯史论小段。孟子在这里示范的是一种责任伦理:历史相似性不能自动成为现实免责理由。