Wan Zhang II · Passage 04 / 09 · 孟子 5B.4
Mencius 5B.4: a respectful gift still needs a just source
Mencius refuses to let ritual courtesy erase the question of source: a gift offered politely may still come from injustice and cannot be cleansed by form.
萬章曰:「敢問交際何心也?」孟子曰:「恭也。」曰:「卻之卻之為不恭,何哉?」曰:「尊者賜之,曰:『其所取之者,義乎不義乎?』而後受之,以是為不恭,故弗卻也。」曰:「請無以辭卻之,以心卻之,曰:『其取諸民之不義也。』而以他辭無受,不可乎?」曰:「其交也以道,其接也以禮,斯孔子受之矣。」萬章曰:「今有御人於國門之外者,其交也以道,其饋也以禮,斯可受御與?」曰:「不可。《康誥》曰:『殺越人于貨,閔不畏死,凡民罔不譈』是不待教而誅者也。殷受夏,周受殷,所不辭也,於今為烈,如之何其受之?」曰:「今之諸侯取之於民也,猶御也。『茍善其禮際矣,斯君子受之』,敢問何說也?」曰:「子以為有王者作,將比今之諸侯而誅之乎?其教之不改而後誅之乎?夫謂非其有而取之者盜也,充類至義之盡也。孔子之仕於魯也,魯人獵較,孔子亦獵較。獵較猶可,而況受其賜乎?」曰:「然則孔子之仕也,非事道與?」曰:「事道也。」「事道奚獵較也?」曰:「孔子先簿正祭器,不以四方之食供簿正。」曰:「奚不去也?」曰:「為之兆也,兆足以行矣,而不行,而後去;是以未嘗有所終三年淹也。孔子有見行可之仕,有際可之仕,有公養之仕。於季桓子,見行可之仕也;於衛靈公,際可之仕也;於衛孝公,公養之仕也。」
Wan Zhang asked Mencius, saying, 'I venture to ask what feeling of the mind is expressed in the presents of friendship?' Mencius replied, 'The feeling of respect.' 'How is it,' pursued Zhang, 'that the declining a present is accounted disrespectful?' The answer was, 'When one of honourable rank presents a gift, to say in the mind, "Was the way in which he got this righteous or not? I must know this before I can receive it" - this is deemed disrespectful, and therefore presents are not declined.' Wan Zhang asked again, 'When one does not take on him in so many express words to refuse the gift, but having declined it in his heart, saying, "It was taken by him unrighteously from the people," and then assigns some other reason for not receiving it - is not this a proper course?' Mencius said, 'When the donor offers it on a ground of reason, and his manner of doing so is according to propriety; in such a case Confucius would have received it.' Wan Zhang said, 'Here now is one who stops and robs people outside the gates of the city. He offers his gift on a ground of reason, and does so in a manner according to propriety - would the reception of it so acquired by robbery be proper?' Mencius replied, 'It would not be proper. In "The Announcement to Kang" it is said, "When men kill others, and roll over their bodies to take their property, being reckless and fearless of death, among all the people there are none but detest them" - thus, such characters are to be put to death, without waiting to give them warning. Yin received this rule from Xia and Zhou received it from Yin. It cannot be questioned, and to the present day is clearly acknowledged. How can the grift of a robber be received?' Zhang said, 'The princes of the present day take from their people just as a robber despoils his victim. Yet if they put a good face of propriety on their gifts, then the superior man receives them. I venture to ask how you explain this.' Mencius answered, 'Do you think that, if there should arise a truly royal sovereign, he would collect the princes of the present day, and put them all to death? Or would he admonish them, and then, on their not changing their ways, put them to death? Indeed, to call every one who takes what does not properly belong to him a robber, is pushing a point of resemblance to the utmost, and insisting on the most refined idea of righteousness. When Confucius was in office in Lu, the people struggled together for the game taken in hunting, and he also did the same. If that struggling for the captured game was proper, how much more may the gifts of the princes be received!' Zhang urged, 'Then are we to suppose that when Confucius held office, it was not with the view to carry his doctrines into practice?' 'It was with that view,' Mencius replied, And Zhang rejoined, 'If the practice of his doctrines was his business, what had he to do with that struggling for the captured game?' Mencius said, 'Confucius first rectified his vessels of sacrifice according to the registers, and did not fill them so rectified with food gathered from every quarter.' 'But why did he not go away?' 'He wished to make a trial of carrying his doctrines into practice. When that trial was sufficient to show that they could be practised and they were still not practised, then he went away, and thus it was that he never completed in any State a residence of three years. Confucius took office when he saw that the practice of his doctrines was likely; he took office when his reception was proper; he took office when he was supported by the State. In the case of his relation to Qi Huan, he took office, seeing that the practice of his doctrines was likely. With the duke Ling of Wei he took office, because his reception was proper. With the duke Xiao of Wei he took office, because he was maintained by the State.'
Priority note
A human-edited reading layer
Central question
Why does Mencius say that receiving a gift requires asking whether it was obtained justly?
Direct answer
Because courtesy says something about the manner of exchange, not about the moral cleanliness of the thing exchanged. If the goods come from injustice, form cannot purify them.
First principle
To judge whether acceptance is right, one must ask not only whether the transfer was graceful, but how the thing accepted came into being.
Why it matters
This passage serves searches around gifts, propriety, justice, and the ethics of receiving benefits in Mencius.
Further reading
What this passage is doing
This is passage 4 of 9 in Wan Zhang II. The cleanest entry point is "I venture to ask what feeling of the…". In context, it works as part of Mencius's argument about recognizing worth, learning, and the relation between name and reality and can be read alongside Humane government / kingly way, Flood-like qi.
Broader search routes
If you came here with a wider question, start from the right hub page
Humane government: political order begins with livelihood
If your real query is broader than one citation, start from the theme page and use this passage as proof text.
Open humane government / kingly wayWho is Mencius?
If you first need the person, the aliases, and why he matters, start from the about page.
Open About MenciusMencius quotes and sayings
If you arrived through a famous line, start from the quotes hub and then return to the exact passage.
Open Mencius quotesMencius full text and works of Mencius
If you need the book structure, the works of Mencius, or where to read the text, start from the full-text hub.
Open the full-text hubBook context
Wan Zhang II leans toward questions of recognizing worth, learning, and whether names match realities.
Related principles
Citation note
Do not focus only on the etiquette of declining. Mencius is guarding the deeper rule that beautiful form cannot wash an unjust source.