Jin Xin I · Passage 26 / 46 · 孟子 7A.26

Mencius 7A.26: holding to the middle without weighing

Mencius criticizes not only Yang and Mo, but also a false moderation that clings to a middle point without the power of concrete judgment.

孟子曰:「楊子取『為我』,拔一毛而利天下,不為也。墨子『兼愛』,摩頂於踵利天下,為之。子莫『執中』,執中為近之。執中無權,猶執一也。所惡執一者,為其賊道也,舉一而廢百也。」

mèng zǐ yuē:「yáng zǐ qǔ 『wéi wǒ』, bá yì máo ér lì tiān xià, bù wéi yě。 mò zǐ 『jiān ài』, mó dǐng wū zhǒng lì tiān xià, wéi zhī。 zǐ mò 『zhí zhōng』, zhí zhōng wéi jìn zhī。 zhí zhōng wú quán, yóu zhí yī yě。 suǒ è zhí yì zhě, wéi qí zéi dào yě, jǔ yī ér fèi bǎi yě。」

Mencius said, 'The principle of the philosopher Yang was "Each one for himself." Though he might have benefited the whole kingdom by plucking out a single hair, he would not have done it. The philosopher Mo loves all equally. If by rubbing smooth his whole body from the crown to the heel, he could have benefited the kingdom, he would have done it. Zi Mo holds a medium between these. By holding that medium, he is nearer the right. But by holding it without leaving room for the exigency of circumstances, it becomes like their holding their one point. The reason why I hate that holding to one point is the injury it does to the way of right principle. It takes up one point and disregards a hundred others.'

Priority note

A human-edited reading layer

Central question

Why does Mencius say that holding the middle without weighing circumstances is just another kind of holding to one point?

Direct answer

Because the true middle is not a static location to be grasped once for all. It requires weighing concrete situations. Without that capacity, moderation becomes another rigid fixation.

First principle

The middle way is not the midpoint on a line but the living judgment that refuses to let any one principle tyrannize over all others.

Why it matters

This passage serves searches around the middle way, Yang Zhu, Mozi, and Mencius on false moderation, expanding the site's philosophical precision.

What this passage is doing

This is passage 26 of 46 in Jin Xin I. The cleanest entry point is "The principle of the philosopher Yang was "Each…". In context, it works as part of Mencius's argument about exhausting the heart, sincerity, and preserving the original heart and can be read alongside Humane government / kingly way.

Broader search routes

If you came here with a wider question, start from the right hub page

Humane government: political order begins with livelihood

If your real query is broader than one citation, start from the theme page and use this passage as proof text.

Open humane government / kingly way

Who is Mencius?

If you first need the person, the aliases, and why he matters, start from the about page.

Open About Mencius

Mencius quotes and sayings

If you arrived through a famous line, start from the quotes hub and then return to the exact passage.

Open Mencius quotes

Mencius full text and works of Mencius

If you need the book structure, the works of Mencius, or where to read the text, start from the full-text hub.

Open the full-text hub

Book context

Jin Xin I centers on exhausting the heart, sincerity, and preserving the capacities already given in the human heart.

Related principles

Citation note

Do not automatically equate 'holding the middle' with maturity. Mencius is warning that without situational weighing, even the middle becomes a damaging absolutism.

Passage profile

Book
Jin Xin I
Location
孟子 7A.26
Position
Passage 26 / 46
Alignment confidence
98%