Gong Sun Chou II · Passage 07 / 14 · 孟子 2B.7
Mencius 2B.7: why insist on using excellent wood
Asked why his mother's coffin wood was so fine, Mencius answers that proper mourning is not for display but for fully satisfying a child's natural feeling.
孟子自齊葬於魯。反於齊,止於嬴。充虞請曰:「前日不知虞之不肖,使虞敦匠事;嚴,虞不敢請。今愿竊有請也:木若以美然。」曰:「古者棺槨無度,中古棺七寸,槨稱之,自天子達於庶人。非直為觀美也,然後盡於人心。不得,不可以為悅;無財,不可以為悅。得之為有財。古之人皆用之,吾何為獨不然?且比化者,無使土親膚,於人心獨無恔乎?吾聞之君子:不以天下儉其親。」
Mencius went from Qi to Lu to bury his mother. On his return to Qi, he stopped at Ying, where Chong Yu begged to put a question to him, and said, 'Formerly, in ignorance of my incompetency, you employed me to superintend the making of the coffin. As you were then pressed by the urgency of the business, I did not venture to put any question to you. Now, however, I wish to take the liberty to submit the matter. The wood of the coffin, it appeared to me, was too good.' Mencius replied, 'Anciently, there was no rule for the size of either the inner or the outer coffin. In middle antiquity, the inner coffin was made seven inches thick, and the outer one the same. This was done by all, from the sovereign to the common people, and not simply for the beauty of the appearance, but because they thus satisfied the natural feelings of their hearts. If prevented by statutory regulations from making their coffins in this way, men cannot have the feeling of pleasure. If they have not the money to make them in this way, they cannot have the feeling of pleasure. When they were not prevented, and had the money, the ancients all used this style. Why should I alone not do so? And moreover, is there no satisfaction to the natural feelings of a man, in preventing the earth from getting near to the bodies of his dead? I have heard that the superior man will not for all the world be niggardly to his parents.'
Priority note
A human-edited reading layer
Central question
Why does Mencius insist on using excellent wood for his mother's coffin instead of imposing austerity on himself?
Direct answer
Because the point is not display but fulfillment of filial feeling. If the means are available and the rites do not forbid it, lowering the burial merely for the sake of appearing frugal wounds what should be honored most.
First principle
Restraint cannot be detached from object and occasion. What may count as frugal elsewhere becomes a distortion if the place where thickness is due is made thin for the sake of reputation.
Why it matters
This passage serves searches around burial, mourning, and filial feeling in Mencius, while reinforcing the site's lines on rite, kinship, and singular remembrance.
Further reading
What this passage is doing
This is passage 7 of 14 in Gong Sun Chou II. The cleanest entry point is "Formerly, in ignorance of my incompetency, you employed…". In context, it works as part of Mencius's argument about flood-like qi, moral judgment, and public responsibility and can be read alongside Humane government / kingly way.
Broader search routes
If you came here with a wider question, start from the right hub page
Humane government: political order begins with livelihood
If your real query is broader than one citation, start from the theme page and use this passage as proof text.
Open humane government / kingly wayWho is Mencius?
If you first need the person, the aliases, and why he matters, start from the about page.
Open About MenciusMencius quotes and sayings
If you arrived through a famous line, start from the quotes hub and then return to the exact passage.
Open Mencius quotesMencius full text and works of Mencius
If you need the book structure, the works of Mencius, or where to read the text, start from the full-text hub.
Open the full-text hubBook context
Gong Sun Chou II develops flood-like qi, steadiness of character, and the public duty of the scholar.
Related principles
Citation note
Do not read it as advocacy of limitless luxury in burial. Mencius is saying that when rite allows and means suffice, one should not damage parental mourning by affective austerity.