Gao Zi II · Passage 14 / 16 · 孟子 6B.14
Mencius 6B.14: three ways to enter and leave office
Mencius distinguishes three levels of accepting office and leaving it, so a scholar can tell whether he stays to carry the Way, honor respect.
陳子曰:「古之君子何如則仕?」孟子曰:「所就三,所去三。迎之致敬以有禮,言將行其言也,則就之;禮貌未衰,言弗行也,則去之。其次,雖未行其言也,迎之致敬以有禮,則就之;禮貌衰,則去之。其下,朝不食,夕不食,饑餓不能出門戶;君聞之,曰:『吾大者不能行其道,又不能從其言也,使饑餓於我土地,吾恥之。』周之,亦可受也,免死而已矣。」
The disciple Chen said, 'What were the principles on which superior men of old took office?' Mencius replied, 'There were three cases in which they accepted office, and three in which they left it. If received with the utmost respect and all polite observances, and they could say to themselves that the prince would carry their words into practice, then they took office with him. Afterwards, although there might be no remission in the polite demeanour of the prince, if their words were not carried into practice, they would leave him. The second case was that in which, though the prince could not be expected at once to carry their words into practice, yet being received by him with the utmost respect, they took office with him. But afterwards, if there was a remission in his polite demeanour, they would leave him. The last case was that of the superior man who had nothing to eat, either morning or evening, and was so famished that he could not move out of his door. If the prince, on hearing of his state, said, "I must fail in the great point, that of carrying his doctrines into practice, neither am I able to follow his words, but I am ashamed to allow him to die of want in my country;" the assistance offered in such a case might be received, but not beyond what was sufficient to avert death.'
Priority note
A human-edited reading layer
Central question
Why does Mencius divide both entering and leaving office into three cases?
Direct answer
Because taking office is not only about whether one remains, but on what basis one remains. The highest case is respect joined to the real possibility of carrying the Way; the lowest is aid accepted only to avoid death.
First principle
Actions with the same outer form may rest on very different inner grounds. Without that distinction, convenience easily disguises itself as principle.
Why it matters
This passage serves searches around office, departure, standards, and why Mencius gives a graded ethics of public vocation.
Further reading
What this passage is doing
This is passage 14 of 16 in Gao Zi II. The cleanest entry point is "What were the principles on which superior men…". In context, it works as part of Mencius's argument about nourishing the heart, judgment, and the formation of character and can be read alongside Flood-like qi, Human nature.
Broader search routes
If you came here with a wider question, start from the right hub page
Flood-like qi: moral courage formed by repeated right action
If your real query is broader than one citation, start from the theme page and use this passage as proof text.
Open flood-like qiWho is Mencius?
If you first need the person, the aliases, and why he matters, start from the about page.
Open About MenciusMencius quotes and sayings
If you arrived through a famous line, start from the quotes hub and then return to the exact passage.
Open Mencius quotesMencius full text and works of Mencius
If you need the book structure, the works of Mencius, or where to read the text, start from the full-text hub.
Open the full-text hubBook context
Gao Zi II connects nourishing the heart, judgment, and character formation into one path of cultivation.
Related principles
Citation note
Do not read it as career negotiation technique. Mencius is separating ways of accepting office by what they are morally for.